Point-of-Care Echocardiography in Non-Cardiology Hands: Training Thresholds, Governance and the Missed Finding
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22497426Keywords:
Point-of-care ultrasound, Focused cardiac ultrasound, Diagnostic accuracy, Clinician training, CredentialingAbstract
Point-of-care cardiac ultrasound (POCUS) has moved from the intensive care unit into routine use by emergency physicians,
intensivists, and generalists, and the American Society of Echocardiography's 2024 nomenclature statement now separates
basic cardiac POCUS/FoCUS from advanced POCUS, critical care echocardiography, and ultrasound-assisted physical
examination -- while deliberately declining to attach any of these to a single regulatory body. Reported training thresholds
vary widely: FoCUS certification is typically framed around 20 to 50 supervised scans against 75 to 250 for comprehensive
transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) certification, while the British Society of Echocardiography's Level 1 route requires 75
personally performed, mentor-verified studies within 12 months. Diagnostic accuracy tracks this training gradient unevenly:
in a tertiary medical intensive care unit, intensivist-performed critical care echocardiography (CCE) matched comprehensive
TTE closely for its core targets -- left ventricular systolic dysfunction (sensitivity 0.87, specificity 0.94) and pericardial
effusion (0.87, 0.99) -- but was markedly less reliable for valve regurgitation, where 60% to 70% of CCE examinations were
simply nondiagnostic for mitral, tricuspid, or aortic insufficiency against only 20% to 30% of TTE examinations. A
meta-analysis of handheld-device use found a comparable experience gradient (68% to 83% sensitivity for non-experienced
operators versus 85% to 89% for experienced operators assessing left ventricular abnormalities), and training-programme
reports from resource-limited settings describe pass rates as low as four of eight trainees. Governance frameworks -- the 2010
ACEP/ASE consensus statement and BSE Level 1 accreditation among them -- converge on the same practical answer: bound
the scope of what basic POCUS is used to rule out, require escalation and cardiology overread for anything outside that
scope, and treat a nondiagnostic view as an actionable result rather than a reassuring one.
References
Kirkpatrick JN, Panebianco N, Diaz-Gomez JL, et al. "Recommendations for Cardiac Point-of-Care Ultrasound Nomenclature". J Am Soc Echocardiogr 37(2024):809-819.
Labovitz AJ, Noble VE, Bierig M, et al. "Focused Cardiac Ultrasound in the Emergent Setting: A Consensus Statement of the American Society of Echocardiography and American College of Emergency Physicians". J Am Soc Echocardiogr 23(2010):1225-1230.
Gibson LE, White-Dzuro GA, Lindsay PJ, Berg SM, Bittner EA, Chang MG. "Ensuring competency in focused cardiac ultrasound: a systematic review of training programs". J Intensive Care 8(2020):93.
Frederiksen CA, Juhl-Olsen P, Andersen NH, Sloth E. "Assessment of cardiac pathology by point-of-care ultrasonography performed by a novice examiner is comparable to the gold standard". Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 21(2013):87.
Fox S, Alwakeel M, Wang X, Dugar S, Chaisson N. "Diagnostic Accuracy of Cardiac Point-of-Care Ultrasound in a Tertiary Medical Intensive Care Unit". Crit Care Explor 5(2023):e1019.
Jenkins S, Alabed S, Swift A, et al. "Diagnostic accuracy of handheld cardiac ultrasound device for assessment of left ventricular structure and function: systematic review and meta-analysis". Heart 107(2021):1826-1834.
Nascimento BR, Beaton AZ. "Improved standardisation of training needed to achieve the potential of handheld echocardiography". Heart 107(2021):1772-1773.
dos Santos J, Ribeiro J, Goncalves FR, Goncalves A. "Point-of-care ultrasound can make the difference in patients with heart failure at primary care". Fam Pract 42(2025):cmaf068.
British Society of Echocardiography. "Accreditation in Adult Level 1 (L1) Echocardiography", Accreditation Pack 2025. bsecho.org, accessed 2026.
