Influence of Cardiovascular Risk Factors on Prevalence of Left Atrial Accessory Appendages and Diverticula in Patients with Atrial Fibrillatio

Authors

  • Danny Veen Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University, Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands Author
  • Tobias A Bruning Department of Cardiology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands Author
  • Natasja MS de Groot Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University, Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands Author

Keywords:

Electrophysiology, Atrial Fibrillation, Pathophysiology, Left Atrial Accessory Appendages, Left atrial Diverticul, CT imaging

Abstract

Background: Left atrial accessory appendages (LAAA) and left atrial diverticula (LAD) may be caused by structural remodeling. The aim of our study is therefore to investigate the relation between the occurrence of LAAA/LAD, different types of atrial fibrillation (AF) and cardiovascular risk factors affecting the atrial structure including age, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia, body mass index (BMI) and sex. To our knowledge, the relation between the occurrence of LAAA and LAD and cardiovascular risk factors has not yet been studied.  Methods: Cardiac CT scans were obtained from patients with sinus rhythm (N=402, SR) and a history of AF (N=422, AF) for evaluation of either coronary artery disease or atrial anatomy prior to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and were screened for the presence of LAD and LAAA. Clinicacharacteristics including cardiovascular risk factors were retrieved from the electronic medical records and correlated with the presence of LAAA/LAD.Results: In 91 (22.6%) SR patients, a total of 90 LAAA and 4 LAD were detected and in the AF group (N=74, 17.5%), 75 LAAA and 2 LAD. LAAA/LAD prevalence did not differ between SR and AF patients (P=.067) nor between patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF (P=0 .924) Also, there was no relation was detected between LAAA/LAD prevalence and cardiovascular risk factors (P > .05). Conclusion: The prevalence of LAAA/LAD in a large patient cohort was not associated with clinical profiles including AF subtypes and cardiovascular risk factors affecting atrial structure. Hence, it is unlikely that LAAA/LAD play an important role in the pathophysiology of AF.Abbreviations: A: Anterior, AF: Atrial Fibrillation, AO: Aorta, BMI: Body Mass Index, CT: Computed Tomography, L: Left, LA: Left Atrium, LAA: Left Atrial Appendage, LAAA: Left Atrial Accessory Appendage, LAD: Left Atrial Diverticula, LSPV: Left Superior Pulmonary Vein, LIPV: Left Inferior Pulmonary Vein, P: Posterior, R: Right, RSPV: Right Superior Pulmonary Vein, RIPV: Right Inferior Pulmonary Vein, SR: Sinus Rhythm.

References

Patel SN, French A, Mathias H, Lyen S, Hamilton MCK, et al. “Presence of left atrial diverticula, accessory appendages, and normal variant pulmonary venous anatomy diagnosed using MDCT and adverse outcomes following radiofrequency catheter ablation therapy in patients with drug-refractory atrial fibrillation: exploratory study”. ClinRadiol 68(2013):762–769.

Troupis J, Crossett M, Scneider-Kolsky M, Nandurkar D. “Presence of accessory left atrial appendage/diverticula in a population with atrial fibrillation compared with those in sinus rhythm: a retrospective review”. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 28(2012):375–380.

Peng L-Q, Yu J-Q, Yang Z-G, Wu D, Xu J-J, Chu Z, et al. “Left atrial diverticula in patients referred for radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation: assessment of prevalence and morphologic characteristics by dual-source computed tomography”. CircArrhythmElectrophysiol 5(2012):345-350.

Genç B, Solak A, Kantarci M, Bayraktutan U, Ogul H, Yuceler Z, et al. “Anatomical features and clinical importance of left atrial diverticula: MDCT findings”. Clinical anatomy 27(2014) :738–747.

Abbara S, Mundo-Sagardia JA, Hoffmann U, Cury RC.“ Cardiac CT assessment of left atrial accessory appendages and diverticulaAJR”. Am J Roentgenol193(2009):807–812.

Wan Y, He Z, Zhang L, Li B, Sun D, Fu F, et al.“ The anatomical study of left atrium diverticulum by multi-detector row CT”. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy 31(2009):191–198.

Calkins H, Hindricks G, Cappato R, Kim Y-H, Saad EB, Aguinaga L, et al. “HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation”. Hear Rhythm 14(2017):275-444.

Starreveld R, van der Does LJME, de Groot NMS. “Anatomical hotspots of fractionated electrograms in the left and right atrium: do they exist?”. Europace 21(2019):60-72.

Killeen RP, O’Connor SA, Keane D, Dodd JD. “Ectopic focus in an accessory left atrial appendage: radiofrequency ablation of refractory atrial fibrillation”. Circulation 120(2009):60- 62.

Lazoura O, Reddy T, Shriharan M, Lindsay A, Nicol E, et al. “Prevalence of left atrial anatomical abnormalities in patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation compared with patients in sinus rhythm using multi-slice CT”. J CardiovascComputTomogr 6(2012);268–273.

De Ponti R, Lumia D, Marazzi R, Mameli S, Doni LA, De Venuto G, et al. “Left atrial diverticula in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation: Morphologic analysis and clinical impact”. J CardiovascElectrophysiol 24(2013):1232-1239.

Incedayi M, Öztürk E, Sönmez G, Saglam M, Sivrio`lu AK, et al. “The incidence of left atrial diverticula in coronary CT angiography”. DiagnIntervRadiol 18(2012):542–546.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-08

How to Cite

Influence of Cardiovascular Risk Factors on Prevalence of Left Atrial Accessory Appendages and Diverticula in Patients with Atrial Fibrillatio. (2026). Journal of Clinical Case Studies and Reviews, 1(1), 9-12. https://pragmajournals.org/index.php/JCCSR/article/view/15